How skinny is too skinny?
Education
Featured
News
Save Equus regularly receives calls direct from members and the public about horses of concern. We work cooperatively with the other agents of the Animal Welfare Act 2002 and once we have identified that the horse reported to us appears to be neglected or being treated cruelly, we liaise with special inspectors. We work to follow up and make sure the concerns raised with us are addresse
A very important indicator to us of a horse’s physical condition and general welfare is its weight, so gauging a horse’s weight to reflect its condition is an important part of Save Equus’s initial assessment of a horse. The following body score rating system, created in Victoria by Patricia Ellis (Attwood) of the Department of Natural Resources and Environment, is the system used by Save Equus. This system helps us communicate about the condition of the horse.
We would like to advise members of this system, so that if you ever have the need to call us about a horse you are concerned about, you will be able to describe the horse’s condition to us more effectively.
An important thing to note when reading this body score rating system is to take account of the horse’s activity level. This information is noted in the body score rating system.
We do not recommend members go out assessing horses with this body score rating system – that is our job and we have trained our volunteers to do this. What we would appreciate is that if you are talking with us about a horse you are concerned about, you tell us about the horse’s neck, back and ribs and pelvis as per the body score rating system, so we get a better idea (first up), through your description, of the condition of the horse.
Methods of estimation
- Assess visually and by feel, the horse’s pelvis and rump, back and ribs and neck.
- Give those areas individual scores using a scale of 0 (very poor) to 5 (very fat).
- Intermediate assessments can be given half scores.
- Using the pelvic and rump assessment as the base, adjust that score by a half point if it differs by one or more points from the score for the neck or ribs.
- Height measurement should be performed on level ground when the horse is relaxed and standing squarely. Use the highest point of the withers as the measuring site. Allowance should be made for shoes.
Body condition scoring system
| Score | Neck | Back and ribs | Pelvis |
| 0 Very poor |
Marked ewe neck. Narrow and slack at base. |
Skin tight over ribs. Spinous processes sharp and easily seen. |
Angular pelvis – skin tight. Deep cavity under tail and either side of croup. |
| 1 Poor |
Ewe neck. Narrow and slack at base. |
Ribs easily visible. Skin sunken either side of backbone. Spinous processes well defined. |
Rump sunken, but skin supple. Pelvis and croup well defined. Deep depression under tail. |
| 2 Moderate |
Narrow but firm | Ribs just visible. Backbone well covered. Spinous processes felt. |
Rump flat either side of backbone. Croup well defined, some fat. Slight cavity under tail. |
| 3 Good |
No crest (except stallions). Firm neck |
Ribs just covered. No gutter along the back. Spinous processes covered but can be felt. |
Covered by fat and rounded. No gutter. Pelvis easily felt. |
| 4 Fat |
Slight crest | Ribs well covered – need firm pressure to feel. Gutter along backbone. |
Gutter to root of tail. Pelvis covered by soft fat – felt only with firm pressure |
| 5 Very fat |
Marked crest. Very wide and firm. Folds of fat. |
Ribs buried – cannot feel. Deep gutter. Back broad and flat. |
Deep gutter to root of tail. Skin distended. Pelvis buried – cannot feel. |
| 0 Very poor |
![]() |
|
| 1 Poor |
< |
|
| 2 Moderate |
![]() |
|
| 3 Good |
![]() |
|
| 4 Fat |
![]() |
|
| 5 Very fat |
![]() |
|
Typical body score conditions of various classes of horses
| Endurance horses | 1.5 – 2.5 |
|
| Polo ponies | 2.0 – 2.5 | |
| Standardbred racehorses | 2.0 – 3.0 | |
| Thoroughbred racehorses | 2.5 – 4.0 | |
| Equestrian horses | 3.0 – 4.0 | |
| Show horses | >4.0 | |
| Broodmares | 2.5 – 4.0 |

<


